Plane Crash,

Ignored Warnings, Over 240 Dead: Air India Dreamliner Crash Rekindles Global Outrage Over Boeing’s Safety Failures

More than 240 people were killed in an Air India Dreamliner crash in Ahmedabad, raising serious questions about Boeing’s manufacturing practices and ignored whistleblower warnings. Investigations are underway amid growing public and regulatory scrutiny.

By Santanu Maity | June 13, 2025 | 10:52 AM IST

More than 240 people lost their lives in India’s worst aviation disaster in a decade when an Air India Boeing 787 Dreamliner crashed into a medical college hostel shortly after taking off from Ahmedabad on Thursday. This tragic incident has reignited concerns over long-standing warnings issued by Boeing’s former Quality Control Manager, John Barnett — warnings that, experts now argue, were dangerously ignored.

The ill-fated flight AI171, headed for London’s Gatwick Airport, had 242 passengers on board. The aircraft lost control moments after take-off and crashed onto a crowded student hostel during lunchtime. Of all those onboard, only one person — a British national of Indian origin seated near an emergency exit — survived and is currently undergoing treatment.

In the midst of grieving families and national shock, many are now questioning whether this tragedy could have been averted had Boeing taken the repeated whistleblower alerts more seriously.

John Barnett, a 32-year Boeing veteran and former quality manager at the North Charleston plant — one of the facilities responsible for manufacturing the Dreamliner — had flagged major safety lapses as early as 2016. He exposed defects in emergency oxygen systems, revealing that as many as 25% of the systems tested failed to deploy — a critical malfunction during any mid-air decompression event. He also alleged that substandard parts, some even retrieved from scrap bins, were being installed into operational aircraft under production pressure.

In 2017, the US aviation regulator, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), validated at least part of Barnett’s claims, acknowledging that 53 non-conforming parts in the Boeing supply chain had gone untraced. Boeing, however, insisted it had addressed the issue. Despite Barnett’s continued legal battle with the company and his cooperation with authorities, no decisive corrective overhaul in Boeing’s production philosophy was ever made public.

Tragically, John Barnett was found dead in March 2024 in a hotel parking lot in Charleston, South Carolina. His death, officially ruled as a self-inflicted wound, came just days after he had deposed in court against Boeing in an ongoing whistleblower lawsuit. His lawyer described the timing and nature of his death as “deeply disturbing.”

Now, in the aftermath of the Air India disaster, the gravity of Barnett’s warnings seems chillingly prophetic.

Investigations into the cause of the Ahmedabad crash are underway, with early speculation pointing towards structural or systems failure. While conclusive technical findings are awaited, aviation safety analysts around the world are drawing attention to a recurring pattern — that Boeing’s production and quality assurance mechanisms may still be compromised.

The Indian government has ordered a high-level technical review of all Boeing 787 Dreamliners operating in the country. Civil aviation authorities are coordinating with international regulators to understand the implications of this crash and reassess aircraft currently in service.

Former pilots, engineers, and safety experts have expressed concern that global airlines — including India’s flag carrier — have continued to operate these aircraft despite whistleblower accounts, FAA audits, and prior technical anomalies. Many are asking: was commercial schedule and cost-efficiency placed above the safety of passengers?

Public trust in Boeing has been shaken repeatedly over the past decade, with earlier crashes of the 737 Max series already highlighting corporate oversight failures. This latest crash, with such a massive death toll, may mark a turning point in regulatory enforcement, aircraft inspection protocols, and how governments treat whistleblower warnings.

As investigators sift through the wreckage in Ahmedabad, the aviation world watches. The questions raised by John Barnett — and the silence that followed — have now turned into one of the most tragic realities in modern aviation history.

Advertisement